<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>starletinc.com &#187; Dakota Fanning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.starletinc.com/category/dakota-fanning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.starletinc.com</link>
	<description>a closer look at young Hollywood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 13:03:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Blonde Showdown</title>
		<link>http://www.starletinc.com/2010/03/blonde-showdown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.starletinc.com/2010/03/blonde-showdown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 12:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>apogeum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AnnaSophia Robb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dakota Fanning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sofia Vassilieva]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starletinc.com/?p=289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the history of Hollywood there has been some sort of obsession with blondes. This one actress who has everyone&#8217;s admiration it seems. If no one has a clue what I&#8217;m talking about it&#8217;s probably best to mention Marylin Monroe by now, that should explain it all. Over the years there always have been actresses [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the history of Hollywood there has been some sort of obsession with blondes. This one actress who has everyone&#8217;s admiration it seems. If no one has a clue what I&#8217;m talking about it&#8217;s probably best to mention Marylin Monroe by now, that should explain it all. Over the years there always have been actresses who are sort of the ranking blonde. Right now however I don&#8217;t think there is on. Ever since Scarlett Johansson decided to go for a darker hair color there is no ranking blonde actress. Yes there have been people trying to bleach their way into the blonde rankings but it&#8217;s just not the same. People like Lindsay Lohan simply aren&#8217;t known as blondes so they can never be the ranking blonde actress in Hollywood. So who is it going to be?</p>
<p>I think we have to look at the currently under age actors as to who will become the next one. People could go for people like Kristen Bell but however lovely she might be, if she hasn&#8217;t made it to that status by now, I don&#8217;t think she&#8217;s going to make it. I think there are currently three main candidates we can look at; Dakota Fanning, AnnaSophia Robb and Sofia Vassilieva. Except for their first names ending in a the main thing they have in common is that their hair has the required hair color. Seeing they&#8217;re still minors I&#8217;m not going to judge them on their vavavoom factor quite yet. Besides, they&#8217;re in Hollywood and this might sound a bit harsh but you don&#8217;t really see ugly people in Hollywood.<span id="more-289"></span></p>
<div id="attachment_290" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 140px"><a href="http://www.starletinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Dakota-Fanning-Push.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-290 " title="Dakota Fanning Push" src="http://www.starletinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Dakota-Fanning-Push-186x300.jpg" alt="" width="130" height="210" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">© Summit Entertainment</p></div>
<p>Lets start with the most famous and youngest one; Dakota Fanning. I&#8217;m afraid she&#8217;s also the first one where I have to say she&#8217;s not going to be the one. She does have the acting talent for it, I think she has shown that in some of her most recent movies like the Secret life of Bees. However in this there is also the matter of perception by the general public. I know too many people who see her as the annoying girl from War of the Worlds and too much as a child star. I still think she&#8217;ll have a lengthy career in Hollywood, the public will just never see her as the one blonde superstar. In that sense I don&#8217;t think that being on the Twilight cast now will do her a lot of favors either. She now has two things to be stereotyped for, even though she joined Twilight at a later date.</p>
<p>So that leaves AnnaSophia and Sofia and they both share a major advantage in my eyes. If you were to mention either name to a random person on the street there would be some people who know them.</p>
<div id="attachment_291" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 220px"><a href="http://www.starletinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/AnnaSophia-Robb-Sleepwalking.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-291 " title="AnnaSophia Robb Sleepwalking" src="http://www.starletinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/AnnaSophia-Robb-Sleepwalking-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="210" height="140" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">© Overture Films</p></div>
<p>There however would be a huge amount of people who would have no idea who they are or what they do. Both of them have already built a bit of a resume in Hollywood by now, not that they&#8217;re huge movies but it&#8217;s more about the people they&#8217;ve worked with. Between them they&#8217;ve worked with people like Charlize Theron, Helen Hunt, Anjelica Huston, Julie Andrews and that&#8217;s only mentioning some of the Oscar winners. There are plenty more Oscar nominated or otherwise well respected and experienced actors in the mix.</p>
<p>Now that itself doesn&#8217;t mean much when they don&#8217;t make use of it. They however have the chance to learn from some incredibly talented people. A privilige which isn&#8217;t there for everyone. Yes of course Dakota has also worked with people like that but AnnaSophia and Sofia don&#8217;t really have that child actor stigma stuck on them. Despite Sofia being on a show which is in its sixth season now she isn&#8217;t famous enough to get that. AnnaSophia has mostly done movies but again never the big block busters which had her as a main star.</p>
<div id="attachment_292" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 220px"><a href="http://www.starletinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Sofia-Vassilieva-My-Sisters-Keeper.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-292 " title="My Sister's Keeper" src="http://www.starletinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Sofia-Vassilieva-My-Sisters-Keeper-300x189.jpg" alt="" width="210" height="132" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">© Warner Brothers</p></div>
<p>Neither AnnaSophia and Sofia seem to be scared to pick up more challenging roles. Of course Sofia did My Sister&#8217;s Keeper in which she had to play a cancer patient which to her own admission wasn&#8217;t easy on a personal level. Annasophia is currently filming the movie Soul Surfer which most likely will ask more of her as well. While it&#8217;s going to be removed with computers her character still lost an arm in a shark attack. No idea if the movie is going to be any good but I can&#8217;t imagine that it&#8217;s easy to portray the emotions of a character like that.</p>
<p>So for both of them goes that they are actually talented actresses which is a requirement in becoming the reigning blonde in Hollywood. If they weren&#8217;t they wouldn&#8217;t be able to make it in Hollywood anyway. So who do I pick? In all reality I don&#8217;t know, they both have the goods to become the reigning blonde in Hollywood, only time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.starletinc.com/2010/03/blonde-showdown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rising Starlets 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.starletinc.com/2009/12/rising-starlets-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.starletinc.com/2009/12/rising-starlets-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>apogeum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dakota Fanning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demi Lovato]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennette McCurdy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kristen Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miley Cyrus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miranda Cosgrove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selena Gomez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sofia Vassilieva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taylor Swift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victoria Justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starletinc.com/?p=254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I have this opinion on all sorts of lists that keep showing up around the internet. They are all pointless, who is best? That is something people usually make up for themselves, you can&#8217;t exactly be told who is best by some random person. That still is a personal opinion from that single person. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I have this opinion on all sorts of lists that keep showing up around the internet. They are all pointless, who is best? That is something people usually make up for themselves, you can&#8217;t exactly be told who is best by some random person. That still is a personal opinion from that single person. Here I&#8217;m talking about all the blogs and sites that make random lists, usually not consulting any kind of vote though those are quite pointless as well. So what to do, those lists will keep showing up around the internet.</p>
<p>Simple enough solution, here is the annual list of rising starlets so now the 2009 edition. So young actresses and musicians in Hollywood who I feel have done the most improvement in their career rated by projects, popularity etc. Yes, it is full of my opinion so no one can tell me I&#8217;m wrong. Here we go.<span id="more-254"></span></p>
<p><strong><em>10. Victoria Justice</em></strong> – Is getting quite a bit of attention for someone who isn&#8217;t on TV all that much. Sure she has her guest spots on Nickelodeon shows her and there and she did the TV movie Spectacular! She is getting an own show on Nickelodeon though for some reason it went a bit quiet around that.</p>
<p><strong><em>9. Demi Lovato</em></strong> – Personally I think she should be up higher on the list, however I also think that she won&#8217;t get the same chances as other people might get. People see her too much as just another Disney star while I think she has more potential than that. This year saw the premiere of her show Sonny With a Chance which gets good ratings, however it doesn&#8217;t quite match  up with other shows on the same channel. Her second album outsold her first album so that is going in the right direction, she&#8217;s developing her own sound.</p>
<p><strong><em>8. Dakota Fanning</em></strong> – Dakota just had success with Twilight: New Moon of course though that isn&#8217;t really down to her. She however is continuing to show that she has some acting talent, the coming year however will be in the shade of Kristen Stewart a bit as she co-stars her twice, in both cases Kristen has the bigger role.</p>
<p><strong><em>7. Selena Gomez</em></strong> – Continues to do well with Wizards of Waverly Place ratings wise, also has a movie coming out next year. Not too confident in her music career honestly but the main public seems to like her and the media makes her out to be bigger than she actually is. The media however is also of major influence in entertainment so that&#8217;s why she ranks higher than for example Demi Lovato.</p>
<p><strong><em>6. Taylor Swift</em></strong> – Basically one of the best selling artists of the year if not the best selling one. For 2010 I however am not to sure, right now she is still milking the success of Fearless which was released in 2008. Even though it had a re-release with new songs she has to do something bigger fairly soon.  Though she is now broadening her horizon into acting as well, so career wise that probably is a good thing.</p>
<p><strong><em>5. Miranda Cosgrove</em></strong> – iCarly is pretty much the highest rated show in its age category, simple as that. She seems fairly settled at Nickelodeon though maybe just a bit too settled. She&#8217;s also recording an album,  I hope it won&#8217;t be what she has been producing so far. So far she&#8217;s only been doing soundtrack work so I&#8217;m still hopeful that she can develop her own sound.</p>
<p><strong><em>4. Jennette McCurdy</em></strong> – I&#8217;m probably the only person who ranks Jennette above Miranda in a comparison like this. She is also a major part in the success of iCarly, so in that part of the success I actually rank them equally. I however see more promise in her music career, unlike what most people would expect she didn&#8217;t sign to a pop label. She&#8217;s going into country music, with her voice I think she has potential there (if you haven&#8217;t heard her sing, just youtube her).</p>
<p><strong><em>3. Kristen Stewart</em></strong> – Twilight, that&#8217;s what sums her up right now at the moment. Though she&#8217;s also doing The Runaways but I don&#8217;t think that will be that big a box office hit, don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s really supposed to be either. Twilight is also her problem though, right now she&#8217;s nothing but Twilight. Even I can see what it did to her name in Hollywood, despite me not actually liking Twilight.</p>
<p><strong><em>2. Sofia Vassilieva</em></strong> – Visitors to this site (even though there aren&#8217;t that many) will know that I have a soft spot for her. In the past year however she has starred in a well received movie (My Sister&#8217;s Keeper) and not just because she shaved her head and eyebrows for it. Her show Medium also moved channels and what did that do? It only made ratings for the show either, quite an achievement for a show that has been on the air for that much time already. Is it due to her? Not in particular but she turns eighteen next year, which means producers for the show will be able to do what I think they have been wanting to do for a while. Give her a bigger role as she can start to work more hours. Only flaw I see is that she doesn&#8217;t really have any new movie projects lined up at this time.</p>
<p><strong><em>1. Miley Cyrus </em></strong>– Yes, yet again I put Miley on the top. Why? Well, think about it. Who was the person with the most blown out of proportion scandals in the past year that weren&#8217;t actually true scandals? That&#8217;s right it was Miley. Did it hurt her career? If it did, I don&#8217;t want to know what would have happened if she didn&#8217;t have any of those scandals. We&#8217;d most likely be visiting churches devoted to Miley by now. She managed to crash Twitter (though there is no real proof for that, just rather curious Twitter crashed right after she deleted her Twitter) and expanded her career to include that of successful clothing designer. She however managed to do one major thing which is the most important; she managed to be Miley Cyrus. People keep saying she&#8217;ll have Hannah Montana branded on her forehead the rest of her life (though maybe that&#8217;s due to the show itself going down in quality), I think she already passed that point though. Next year will also see a movie in which she isn&#8217;t Hannah Montana and another album release. Nothing to suggest that she will go downhill, even if that is what certain media are trying to make people believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.starletinc.com/2009/12/rising-starlets-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Edition 58: The Jailbait top ten</title>
		<link>http://www.starletinc.com/2008/10/edition-58-the-jailbait-top-ten/</link>
		<comments>http://www.starletinc.com/2008/10/edition-58-the-jailbait-top-ten/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>apogeum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ali Lohan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AnnaSophia Robb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dakota Fanning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emily Osment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emma Roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miley Cyrus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miranda Cosgrove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selena Gomez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sofia Vassilieva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taylor Momsen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starletinc.com/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jailbait: a girl under the age of consent with whom sexual intercourse is unlawful and constitutes statutory rape.
So who&#8217;s worth it going to jail for? Here&#8217;s our top ten.
10. Miranda Cosgrove: She&#8217;s got a nice pair of legs on her but there&#8217;s not much else to her. Who knows, she&#8217;s only fifteen so who knows [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Jailbait: a girl under the age of consent with whom sexual intercourse is unlawful and constitutes statutory rape.</p></blockquote>
<p>So who&#8217;s worth it going to jail for? Here&#8217;s our top ten.<span id="more-19"></span></p>
<p><strong>10. <em>Miranda Cosgrove</em></strong>: She&#8217;s got a nice pair of legs on her but there&#8217;s not much else to her. Who knows, she&#8217;s only fifteen so who knows what the next couple of years will bring.</p>
<p><strong>9. <em>Emma Roberts</em>: </strong>Another nice pair of legs and a cute smile. But she turns eighteen in February so she has no longevity on the list. So just being patient would remove the risks of jailtime.</p>
<p><strong>8. <em>Sofia Vassilieva</em></strong>: People might wonder why she is on this list; she&#8217;s not really a starlet that gets a lot of attention except for positive critical reviews. However she did a movie where she had to shave her head; no hair whatsoever. Makes you wonder, did she limit it to her head? It gets the imagination going.</p>
<p><strong>7.<em> AnnaSophia Robb</em></strong>: She&#8217;s a cute girl, no way around it. That combined with her latest movie where she smokes in a seductive way earns her a spot in our top ten.</p>
<p><strong>6. <em>Ali Lohan</em></strong>: Her boobs are big enough to spark a plastic surgery rumor and she&#8217;s only fourteen years old. That combined with her revealing way of dressing on her show Living Lohan shows a lot of promise for the future; especially seeing she already auditioned for a porn producer.</p>
<p><strong>5. <em>Dakota Fanning</em></strong>: Has been out of the picture for a while, she did a rape movie which didn&#8217;t get as much attention as she wanted. Now she&#8217;s coming back with a vengeance, in Push she&#8217;ll be wearing short skirts. What gets her up to number five however is that she joined her high schools cheerleading squad. Who hasn&#8217;t had fantasies about high school cheerleaders?</p>
<p><strong>4. <em>Emily Osment</em></strong>: She doesn&#8217;t get the attention she deserves, over the past year she has developed quite a bit in her bust area which sparks some interest from people. She gets a lot of screentime as well and seeing the new season of Hannah Montana promises to be more grown up we should be seeing some nicer outfits. The Hannah Montana movie will probably do the same.</p>
<p><strong>3. <em>Selena Gomez</em></strong>: Hot latina; that&#8217;s as much as you can say about her really. So why bother wasting words on it.</p>
<p><strong>2. <em>Miley Cyrus</em></strong>: with the leaked pictures of the  past year a lot of the mystery has been taken away which is a pity. She still has an amazing pair of legs and is starting to develop in other areas and she&#8217;s only fifteen; she&#8217;ll be a forced to be reckoned with. Though a year ago she was dressing more revealing; she&#8217;s toned down a bit which is a pity and cost her the top spot.</p>
<p><strong>1. <em>Taylor Momsen</em></strong>: Hot leggy blonde; what else do you want? A seductive look in her eyes with dark eyeliner to increase the effect. Short dresses with straps almost sliding of her shoulders and that at an age of barely fifteen and that while she doesn&#8217;t even look her age, what else could you want? There&#8217;s just no one out there that can beat her right now.</p>
<p>And now seriously; do you really think we&#8217;re going to rank teen celebrities on how hot they are? Of course not but the problem is that a lot of people do, these girls are no wear the legal age and adult people wish they could be in their pants. I&#8217;ve pointed out before that some of these girls are dressing above their age. It&#8217;s mainly the media and the people that are sexualizing them though, it&#8217;s a normal fact that teenagers like to dress up sexy at some point. The thing with these Hollywood girls is just that when you have professionally style hair and make up; they don&#8217;t exactly look their age. Just show a person who doesn&#8217;t know Taylor Momsen a pic of her at an official event. Just see how many people will guess that she&#8217;s only fifteen years old.</p>
<p>There are image forums around the internet where pictures of celebrities are shared. Last year these forums had rules that stated that pictures of celebrities under the age of fourteen weren&#8217;t allowed. Then however Miley Cyrus came along and she wore short dresses a couple of times and got some attention. After the comments got out of hand and were far too inappropriate at least two of the bigger image forums actually changed their rules to no pictures of celebrities under the age of sixteen.</p>
<p>Then there is the pedobear thing. Most people won&#8217;t have heard about it probably but it&#8217;s a growing thing around the internet. When something is considered sexy and the person it is about is a minor the pedo bear is pulled into it. Though I have to admit that the pedobear thing is mostly used in good fun; nothing bad is meant by it. It does show a general tendency to sexualize minors though.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just something that&#8217;s in our society though; it&#8217;s not like it can be changed though it might just be a phase. The image forums changing their rules is only a stopgap measure anyway; Miley turns sixteen in a month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.starletinc.com/2008/10/edition-58-the-jailbait-top-ten/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Edition 35: Overnight sensation? Not really</title>
		<link>http://www.starletinc.com/2007/12/edition-35-overnight-sensation-not-really/</link>
		<comments>http://www.starletinc.com/2007/12/edition-35-overnight-sensation-not-really/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>apogeum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dakota Blue Richards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dakota Fanning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hilary Duff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jena Malone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miley Cyrus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanessa Hudgens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starletinc.com/?p=146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a lot of cases with child actors people and the media call them overnight successes, that they did one thing and it made them successful right away. Even though that&#8217;s true in some cases like Natalie Portman who became a recognised actress overnight with the movie Léon it&#8217;s not true for a lot of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a lot of cases with child actors people and the media call them overnight successes, that they did one thing and it made them successful right away. Even though that&#8217;s true in some cases like Natalie Portman who became a recognised actress overnight with the movie Léon it&#8217;s not true for a lot of other child actors.</p>
<p>It can be funny sometimes if you look at filmographies and it turns out that you&#8217;ve seen them in movies before without even realising it. I&#8217;m not counting tiny guest spots on TV shows right now; if I did that I could be going on forever seeing that&#8217;s pretty much how every actor gets started.</p>
<p>The first time I really had that was when I was looking at the filmography of Jena Malone. Granted, she&#8217;s not really a superstar but she still gets a fair amount of movies done. At some point I did check out her filmography because I didn&#8217;t really know her, turns out I have a on DVD with the woman; Contact in this case which she made when she was twelve years old. Her role in that movie is better known for a difficult special effect (It&#8217;s extensively mentioned in the extras; Jena is running towards a mirror but you can&#8217;t see the camera. In 1997 that was a lot more difficult than it would be these days.). She plays the younger version of Jodie Foster in the movie.<span id="more-146"></span><br />
Another case like this is Hilary Duff, though I had seen her on Lizzie McGuire before seeing the movie Human Nature. Human Nature is a movie  by Studio Canal, a European studio, in which she plays the younger version of Patricia Arquette. It did take some time before the movie was released which is clearly shown by the fact that Hilary looks a fair amount younger than on Lizzie McGuire. I didn&#8217;t even recognise her in the part.</p>
<p>Most recent example would be Miley Cyrus; people in general think that Hannah Montana is her first acting job. Well it isn&#8217;t, I only saw part of the movie Big Fish before every hearing of Miley Cyrus but it turns out she&#8217;s in it. Granted she only says two words in her whole appearance but she&#8217;s still there. She&#8217;s not even on the cast list as Miley but as Destiny Cyrus, I guess she was still a bit behind on her growth back then seeing she was playing an eight year old when she was ten.</p>
<p>For another Disney star, Vanessa Hudgens, it&#8217;s known that before doing High School Musical she was in the flopped Thunderbirds movie. Not that many people realise that she was in the critically acclaimed Thirteen; which launched Evan Rachel Wood&#8217;s career. I sure hadn&#8217;t a clue that she was in it before her name was known to everyone.</p>
<p>Even Dakota Fanning played the young version of Reese Witherspoon in Sweet Home Alabama before anyone really had heard of her as a child actor. It just shows that real overnight sensations are extremely rare though some studios are now trying to create some. Like New Line which is trying to launch Dakota Blue Richards through the Golden Compass movies.</p>
<p>So the next time if you think you see an overnight sensation you might want to check out the rest of their filmography, it might turn out that you&#8217;ve seen them before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.starletinc.com/2007/12/edition-35-overnight-sensation-not-really/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Edition 26: Sisters</title>
		<link>http://www.starletinc.com/2007/10/edition-26-sisters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.starletinc.com/2007/10/edition-26-sisters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 13:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>apogeum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dakota Fanning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Danielle Panabaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elle Fanning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kay Panabaker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starletinc.com/?p=173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s quite common for siblings to be in the entertainment business. The same is true for the younger generation; people can probably notice that some people on starletlinks.com and starletviews.com share the same last name. This is of course because they&#8217;re sisters. Though it makes you wonder, who will have the bigger career in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s quite common for siblings to be in the entertainment business. The same is true for the younger generation; people can probably notice that some people on starletlinks.com and starletviews.com share the same last name. This is of course because they&#8217;re sisters. Though it makes you wonder, who will have the bigger career in the end. So basically who is the most talented even though shear talent doesn&#8217;t always seem to be enough.</p>
<p>On starletlinks.com there are two main sister pares featured; Dakota and Elle Fanning are probably the best known ones right now. Dakota is four years older than Elle, that doesn&#8217;t really mean she works more though. While Dakota is in the spot light more than her little sister; Elle manages to pull of more movies a year than Dakota. Though I would have to add that a lot of the roles Elle does are smaller, supporting roles instead of starring roles. However she works with experienced actors like Denzel Washington and Brad Pitt, a perfect learning ground.</p>
<p>The fact that Dakota is in the spotlight more might help Elle in the end, she can stay in the background and slowly learn the trade. While Dakota might very well get stuck with the stigma of child star forever; Elle will probably have less of a problem with that. If I had to judge on pure talent I&#8217;m not certain actually, I have some movies with Elle and Dakota but not quite enough to form a definite opinion. Right now there isn&#8217;t that much of a difference between them I would say, though as I said I rate Elle&#8217;s chances in the long run higher.<span id="more-173"></span></p>
<p>The other sister pair that is featured on starletlinks.com is the Panabaker sisters; twenty year old Danielle and seventeen year old Kay. Both of them aren&#8217;t really big names in Hollywood yet but that doesn&#8217;t mean they won&#8217;t in the long run. We know already know they&#8217;re both very smart girls, something I talked about a couple of weeks ago. They&#8217;re also both very cute girls, Danielle is just quite a bit taller than her younger sister. They&#8217;re also both not that much in the spotlight which will help them probably; they can slowly build their career. Shooting to a big career right away hasn&#8217;t always proven beneficial.</p>
<p>Question just is; who&#8217;s the better actress? So far I&#8217;ve been able to see quite a lot of both and the result is. Best way to compare them is probably the Disney movie Read it and Weep where Danielle plays the alter ego of Kay. They just both do a good job, also in their other work I can&#8217;t really make up my mind. Danielle is currently doing a very good job in the CBS show Shark; meanwhile Kay is busy promoting her movie Moondance Alexander which already won a couple of prizes and is getting good reviews. Of course I haven&#8217;t seen that movie yet, the wide release isn&#8217;t until later this month.</p>
<p>So in this case I would actually say the both have an equally good shot at making it in Hollywood. They&#8217;re smart, cute and their getting acknowledgement for their acting talent. Guess they just need some more drama around them for the big public to take interest in them. Danielle plays a teenager that gets drunk and gets DUI&#8217;s on Shark; though that&#8217;s not real of course. They&#8217;re both steadily building their career so as long as they decide to stick to acting I think we&#8217;ll see quite a lot of them in the next ten years.</p>
<p>Also expect other sisters to come along in the next couple of years; no I&#8217;m not talking about Aliana Lohan. Her mother is probably ruining any chance of a career she ever had with her public dealing with Lindsay&#8217;s problems. I&#8217;m more talking about the likes of twelve year old Stella Hudgens, younger sister of Vanessa. She has been cast for the new Fox show Deeply Irresponsible, though it&#8217;s uncertain when the show will premiere. I also wouldn&#8217;t be too surprised to see a Disney show featuring Noah Cyrus at some point. There are also plenty of sisters out there I don&#8217;t even know about yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.starletinc.com/2007/10/edition-26-sisters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
