<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>starletinc.com &#187; Emma Roberts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.starletinc.com/tag/emma-roberts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.starletinc.com</link>
	<description>a closer look at young Hollywood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 19:30:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Edition 58: The Jailbait top ten</title>
		<link>http://www.starletinc.com/2008/10/edition-58-the-jailbait-top-ten/</link>
		<comments>http://www.starletinc.com/2008/10/edition-58-the-jailbait-top-ten/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>apogeum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ali Lohan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AnnaSophia Robb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dakota Fanning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emily Osment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emma Roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miley Cyrus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miranda Cosgrove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selena Gomez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sofia Vassilieva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taylor Momsen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starletinc.com/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jailbait: a girl under the age of consent with whom sexual intercourse is unlawful and constitutes statutory rape. So who&#8217;s worth it going to jail for? Here&#8217;s our top ten. 10. Miranda Cosgrove: She&#8217;s got a nice pair of legs on her but there&#8217;s not much else to her. Who knows, she&#8217;s only fifteen so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Jailbait: a girl under the age of consent with whom sexual intercourse is unlawful and constitutes statutory rape.</p></blockquote>
<p>So who&#8217;s worth it going to jail for? Here&#8217;s our top ten.<span id="more-19"></span></p>
<p><strong>10. <em>Miranda Cosgrove</em></strong>: She&#8217;s got a nice pair of legs on her but there&#8217;s not much else to her. Who knows, she&#8217;s only fifteen so who knows what the next couple of years will bring.</p>
<p><strong>9. <em>Emma Roberts</em>: </strong>Another nice pair of legs and a cute smile. But she turns eighteen in February so she has no longevity on the list. So just being patient would remove the risks of jailtime.</p>
<p><strong>8. <em>Sofia Vassilieva</em></strong>: People might wonder why she is on this list; she&#8217;s not really a starlet that gets a lot of attention except for positive critical reviews. However she did a movie where she had to shave her head; no hair whatsoever. Makes you wonder, did she limit it to her head? It gets the imagination going.</p>
<p><strong>7.<em> AnnaSophia Robb</em></strong>: She&#8217;s a cute girl, no way around it. That combined with her latest movie where she smokes in a seductive way earns her a spot in our top ten.</p>
<p><strong>6. <em>Ali Lohan</em></strong>: Her boobs are big enough to spark a plastic surgery rumor and she&#8217;s only fourteen years old. That combined with her revealing way of dressing on her show Living Lohan shows a lot of promise for the future; especially seeing she already auditioned for a porn producer.</p>
<p><strong>5. <em>Dakota Fanning</em></strong>: Has been out of the picture for a while, she did a rape movie which didn&#8217;t get as much attention as she wanted. Now she&#8217;s coming back with a vengeance, in Push she&#8217;ll be wearing short skirts. What gets her up to number five however is that she joined her high schools cheerleading squad. Who hasn&#8217;t had fantasies about high school cheerleaders?</p>
<p><strong>4. <em>Emily Osment</em></strong>: She doesn&#8217;t get the attention she deserves, over the past year she has developed quite a bit in her bust area which sparks some interest from people. She gets a lot of screentime as well and seeing the new season of Hannah Montana promises to be more grown up we should be seeing some nicer outfits. The Hannah Montana movie will probably do the same.</p>
<p><strong>3. <em>Selena Gomez</em></strong>: Hot latina; that&#8217;s as much as you can say about her really. So why bother wasting words on it.</p>
<p><strong>2. <em>Miley Cyrus</em></strong>: with the leaked pictures of the  past year a lot of the mystery has been taken away which is a pity. She still has an amazing pair of legs and is starting to develop in other areas and she&#8217;s only fifteen; she&#8217;ll be a forced to be reckoned with. Though a year ago she was dressing more revealing; she&#8217;s toned down a bit which is a pity and cost her the top spot.</p>
<p><strong>1. <em>Taylor Momsen</em></strong>: Hot leggy blonde; what else do you want? A seductive look in her eyes with dark eyeliner to increase the effect. Short dresses with straps almost sliding of her shoulders and that at an age of barely fifteen and that while she doesn&#8217;t even look her age, what else could you want? There&#8217;s just no one out there that can beat her right now.</p>
<p>And now seriously; do you really think we&#8217;re going to rank teen celebrities on how hot they are? Of course not but the problem is that a lot of people do, these girls are no wear the legal age and adult people wish they could be in their pants. I&#8217;ve pointed out before that some of these girls are dressing above their age. It&#8217;s mainly the media and the people that are sexualizing them though, it&#8217;s a normal fact that teenagers like to dress up sexy at some point. The thing with these Hollywood girls is just that when you have professionally style hair and make up; they don&#8217;t exactly look their age. Just show a person who doesn&#8217;t know Taylor Momsen a pic of her at an official event. Just see how many people will guess that she&#8217;s only fifteen years old.</p>
<p>There are image forums around the internet where pictures of celebrities are shared. Last year these forums had rules that stated that pictures of celebrities under the age of fourteen weren&#8217;t allowed. Then however Miley Cyrus came along and she wore short dresses a couple of times and got some attention. After the comments got out of hand and were far too inappropriate at least two of the bigger image forums actually changed their rules to no pictures of celebrities under the age of sixteen.</p>
<p>Then there is the pedobear thing. Most people won&#8217;t have heard about it probably but it&#8217;s a growing thing around the internet. When something is considered sexy and the person it is about is a minor the pedo bear is pulled into it. Though I have to admit that the pedobear thing is mostly used in good fun; nothing bad is meant by it. It does show a general tendency to sexualize minors though.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just something that&#8217;s in our society though; it&#8217;s not like it can be changed though it might just be a phase. The image forums changing their rules is only a stopgap measure anyway; Miley turns sixteen in a month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.starletinc.com/2008/10/edition-58-the-jailbait-top-ten/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Edition 46: Official websites; one year later</title>
		<link>http://www.starletinc.com/2008/04/edition-46-official-websites-one-year-later/</link>
		<comments>http://www.starletinc.com/2008/04/edition-46-official-websites-one-year-later/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>apogeum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abigail Breslin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Danielle Panabaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emma Watson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kay Panabaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lindsay lohan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sofia Vassilieva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emma Roberts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starletinc.com/?p=60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About a year ago I wrote about how pitiful a lot of the official websites for the people linked on starletlinks.com are. So I took a look at the sites a year later and also looked at other ones; there is good news and bad news. Lets start with the bad examples of last year, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About a year ago I wrote about how pitiful a lot of the official websites for the people linked on <a onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.starletlinks.com?referer=http://www.starletviews.com/wp-admin/edit.php?paged=2');" href="http://www.starletlinks.com" target="_blank">starletlinks.com</a> are. So I took a look at the sites a year later and also looked at other ones; there is good news and bad news.</p>
<p>Lets start with the bad examples of last year, it&#8217;s always best to start with the bad news. <a onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.llrocks.com?referer=http://www.starletviews.com/wp-admin/edit.php?paged=2');" href="http://www.llrocks.com" target="_blank">LLrocks.com</a>, Lindsay Lohan&#8217;s official site still hasn&#8217;t received a single update. A last update on the 27th February 2005 was bad enough last year now it&#8217;s even worse, I can&#8217;t even imagine how little they care about her web presence. Yes of course she has more important things to take care off, she has to try and rebuild her career but a good web presence could be a sign to people that she really is serious about it. Though the Lohan family doesn&#8217;t take the internet serious anyway, they&#8217;re trying to launch Aliana Lohan&#8217;s career but her site is probably even worse than Lindsay&#8217;s, no information there whatsoever.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-61" title="abigail" src="http://starletinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/abigail-300x277.jpg" alt="abigail" width="300" height="277" />Another site that hasn&#8217;t received a single update in the past year is <a onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.abigailbreslin.com?referer=http://www.starletviews.com/wp-admin/edit.php?paged=2');" href="http://www.abigailbreslin.com" target="_blank">Abigail Breslin&#8217;s site</a>. Just like last year it still mentions that she&#8217;s nominated for an Academy Award, this time last year we already know she didn&#8217;t win it. Looking at the <a onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.sofiav.com/?referer=http://www.starletviews.com/wp-admin/edit.php?paged=2');" href="http://www.sofiav.com/" target="_blank">website of Sofia Vassilieva</a> who&#8217;s now Abigails co-star in My Sister&#8217;s Keeper it&#8217;s even worse. Not a single update in about seven years on a website for a girl that&#8217;s just fifteen. So her site hasn&#8217;t been updated for pretty much half her life, not the mention the very old school internet background music on the site. They don&#8217;t have to be active on the internet themselves, that might cause more trouble than it&#8217;s worth. But they should remember that they have a fanbase that does go online, they care and don&#8217;t like things like this. A good web presence shows that a celebrity cares about their fans, of course it doesn&#8217;t mean that Sofa and Abigail don&#8217;t but it&#8217;s not that big an effort.</p>
<p><span id="more-60"></span><br />
To illustrate that I can give the example of the official websites for<a onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.kaypanabaker.com?referer=http://www.starletviews.com/wp-admin/edit.php?paged=2');" href="http://www.kaypanabaker.com" target="_blank"> Kay</a> and <a onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.daniellepanabaker.com?referer=http://www.starletviews.com/wp-admin/edit.php?paged=2');" href="http://www.daniellepanabaker.com" target="_blank">Danielle</a> Panabaker. Both their sites are basically the same, a very simple design, they just have different graphics. The core design is identical, they&#8217;re sisters so why not let someone design two sites in one go. The sites aren&#8217;t overflowing with information, news or pictures but they are up to date. At least it shows that they are aware of their web presence, they&#8217;re both in college and have acting careers on the side so I can understand that they don&#8217;t waste too much time on updating a website.<img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-62" title="kay" src="http://starletinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/kay-300x289.jpg" alt="kay" width="300" height="289" /></p>
<p>The Disney people like <a onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.ashleytisdale.com?referer=http://www.starletviews.com/wp-admin/edit.php?paged=2');" href="http://www.ashleytisdale.com" target="_blank">Ashley Tisdale</a> and <a onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.mileycyrus.com?referer=http://www.starletviews.com/wp-admin/edit.php?paged=2');" href="http://www.mileycyrus.com" target="_blank">Miley Cyrus</a> still have their things in order as well. Not really sites that are overflowing with things but they&#8217;re up to date. Though in Miley&#8217;s case there of course is also <a onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.mileyworld.com?referer=http://www.starletviews.com/wp-admin/edit.php?paged=2');" href="http://www.mileyworld.com" target="_blank">Mileyworld.com</a> where you have to pay to join (I haven&#8217;t been able to see it for myself but people that have joined seem to like the regular updates in videos and pictures, just forgetting the whole concert ticket deal for now). That site receives daily updates but Mileyworld also have a staff of people taking care of that. I&#8217;m not going to discuss all other pages again though, most of them pretty much stayed the same, some received regular updates and others less regular.</p>
<p>But we should also come to the positive news at some point. <a onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.emmawatsonofficial.com?referer=http://www.starletviews.com/wp-admin/edit.php?paged=2');" href="http://www.emmawatsonofficial.com" target="_blank">Emma Watson finally launched an official website</a> last year; though she might have had one before but if she did it wasn&#8217;t noticeable. Her new site is a sleek flash design but unlike a lot of flash sites it also contains a lot of information. There is a sort of diary on there but it really doesn&#8217;t add a lot, Emma doesn&#8217;t really posts that often and if she does the messages are quite short. But the news section on the site is more up to date than any other official website linked on <a onclick="urchinTracker('/outgoing/www.starletlinks.com?referer=http://www.starletviews.com/wp-admin/edit.php?paged=2');" href="http://www.starletlinks.com" target="_blank">starletlinks.com</a>.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-63" title="emma" src="http://starletinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/emma-300x235.jpg" alt="emma" width="300" height="235" />Sadly Emma&#8217;s website is the only real positive change that is to be found, for the rest the sites either didn&#8217;t really change that much and just received some updates. That besides the large number of sites that didn&#8217;t receive any updates at all. Especially the lack of updates on diaries is annoying, having a diary section suggests that at some point that celebrity was planning on keeping the site up to date but at some point just lost interest or got too busy. In that case they should just shut down that section of the website, just leave static content. It&#8217;s better to give the impression of an up to date website than a website that looks like it has been left all alone on the internet and no one is taking care of it. I&#8217;m not a master web designer but I could do a better job than what has been done on some of those sites. Lets hope that there will be an improvement one year from now. I also hope that more of them will make official websites, most of them still don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.starletinc.com/2008/04/edition-46-official-websites-one-year-later/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

