<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>starletinc.com &#187; Kaley Cuoco</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.starletinc.com/tag/kaley-cuoco/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.starletinc.com</link>
	<description>a closer look at young Hollywood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 19:30:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Edition 39: The Strike</title>
		<link>http://www.starletinc.com/2008/02/edition-39-the-strike/</link>
		<comments>http://www.starletinc.com/2008/02/edition-39-the-strike/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 12:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>apogeum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abigail Breslin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashley Tisdale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emily Osment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miley Cyrus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sofia Vassilieva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sophia Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanessa Hudgens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hayden Panettiere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kaley Cuoco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starletinc.com/?p=79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The WGA (Writers Guild of America) strike seems to be coming to an end now (it all seems to depend on a WGA meeting tomorrow), or who knows; once you read this it might be already over. But what kind of damage has it actually caused? Three months of strike don&#8217;t really go without consequence. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The WGA (Writers Guild of America) strike seems to be coming to an end now (it all seems to depend on a WGA meeting tomorrow), or who knows; once you read this it might be already over. But what kind of damage has it actually caused? Three months of strike don&#8217;t really go without consequence. We hear daily reports on how much money the movie industry has already lost this year.</p>
<p>I have to make clear that I support the writers (I&#8217;m trying to be one myself so I have to really), though I also understand the AMPTP (Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers). The main point of argument is the compensation for online content, so when they&#8217;ve made a TV show or movie and it&#8217;s also streamed on the internet. Of course the writers want to be paid for this but no one knows how the internet market will develop.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a time where developments go really quickly, you can&#8217;t actually know how much money the internet content will make over the years. So it&#8217;s understandable that the studios were very hesitant, though pretty much paying them nothing at all is a bad idea when going into talks. At some times the strike got a bit silly though, there were some AMPTP and WGA mud slinging matches.<span id="more-79"></span></p>
<p>The real victims right now aren&#8217;t the big actors though, they have plenty of money to live of, it&#8217;s the production crews that are suffering. Studios responded to the strike by firing the â€œcommonâ€ man working in their studios. So in that regard it will take some time until the industry recovers, some people have left to get other job because they need to eat. That&#8217;s not really what this site is about though, so lets take a look at what consequence it has had on our featured actresses in particular.</p>
<p>The strike pretty much meant that production halted on movie projects and TV shows. The damage to movies is actually limited because it sometimes takes years before a movie gets from script to actually finished movie. Except for projects that have shorter production times, we&#8217;re talking popular projects that require a fast production time before it becomes unpopular again. In our case there&#8217;s only one clear victim: Disney.</p>
<p>Shooting for High School Musical 3 and the Hannah Montana Movie should almost have started already but they won&#8217;t. Simple reason is that their scripts aren&#8217;t done yet, they&#8217;re in the rough draft stage and they still need some work. It will probably mean that High School Musical 3 will be delayed until late 2008 while it&#8217;s very likely that the Hannah Montana Movie will be delayed until 2009. They don&#8217;t want both movies in theatres at the same time so even if they did rush them they&#8217;ll have a hard time fitting them into 2008 without them interfering with each other.</p>
<p>So in that regard it&#8217;s only a problem for people like Vanessa Hudgens, Ashley Tisdale and other High School Musical Stars. For other movie projects our actresses are featured in it&#8217;s not really a big problem. They&#8217;re more long term projects and the ones that are planned for this year are already done or are already in the shooting stage so those should be released on time.</p>
<p>For TV it&#8217;s a bigger problem, the production time on TV shows is a lot shorter. Several TV shows have already run out of episodes, some even weeks after the strike started. Main victim of that was probably Kaley Cuoco when The Big Bang Theory stopped production just weeks into the strike (Not that it&#8217;s a show that would be missed on TV, I&#8217;m not too fond of it but that&#8217;s beside the point). Who knows when that will go back into production, it will be one very short season that much is certain.</p>
<p>Again Disney has to deal with it, production on a lot of their Disney Channel shows stopped. They seem to be trying to stretch their seasons until they have new episodes, new episodes of Hannah Montana have slowed to under one new episode per month. They&#8217;re done shooting season two but they probably want to stretch it until they can start production on season three (and the movie). Not that Miley Cyrus has had much trouble with it, she simply extended her concert tour by a month. Co-star Emily Osment has been keeping busy shooting a TV movie for Disney, so they&#8217;ve been doing fine. Though Hannah Montana fans are upset with the lack of new episodes.</p>
<p>For some shows I don&#8217;t actually know how many shows they have on reserve, for example Medium. It didn&#8217;t start its season until 2008, they probably produced most of the shows in advance but not all. Sofia Vassilieva has once stated that they get their scripts about two weeks before shooting so the time between writing ans production is very short. That also means that once the strike is over they can go back into production quite quickly again, depending on whether they can get all their support staff back.</p>
<p>One of the other most notable victims is Heroes, they&#8217;ve only put out eleven episodes this season. They planned to do the season in two halves which probably will save them, seeing they can go into a third season without real continuity problems. It does mean that people like Hayden Panettiere haven&#8217;t been really busy so far, even though she signed on to a new movie project, that just hasn&#8217;t started shooting yet.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s another thing with the strike, pilot season is coming up as they call it. It&#8217;s when production companies make pilot episodes of new shows, based on those episodes they decide whether to take a show into their programming or not. The main problem right now is; there are no pilot scripts so there&#8217;s nothing to shoot. It might very well mean that there will be no to very few new TV shows for the 2008-2009 season. It&#8217;s also good news for people that fear their favourite show might be cancelled though, the studios will be more likely to renew existing shows.</p>
<p>So that&#8217;s good news for people that enjoy shows like Medium (Sofia Vassilieva) and One Tree Hill (Sophia Bush and others); they&#8217;ve been renewed on a season to season bases in recent years. The strike might have improved their chances of renewal considerably. It also means that a lot of the crappy new shows (somehow all new sitcoms that came along this TV season were horrible to complete crap) might get renewed as well. So it might very well be a very boring 2008-2009 TV season, just a good thing that the movies coming out this and next year haven&#8217;t been influenced a lot.</p>
<p>I just hope that something like this doesn&#8217;t happen again, a lot of behind the scenes people have suffered from the strike and will probably need some time to recover from it. Three months without income is a disaster for any family with a normal income. Good thing the DGA (Directors Guild of America) has already agreed on a deal so they won&#8217;t be striking. However the SAG (Screen Actors Guild) is coming to an end and they have similar issues with the AMPTP as the WGA had, so lets just hope it doesn&#8217;t lead to another strike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.starletinc.com/2008/02/edition-39-the-strike/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Edition 34: Falling Starlets 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.starletinc.com/2007/12/edition-34-falling-starlets-2007/</link>
		<comments>http://www.starletinc.com/2007/12/edition-34-falling-starlets-2007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 11:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>apogeum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emmy Rossum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hilary Duff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jamie Lynn Spears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kaley Cuoco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirsten Dunst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lacey Chabert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lindsay lohan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Trachtenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sara Paxton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tina Majorino]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.starletinc.com/?p=149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As promised last week here&#8217;s the list of falling starlets of 2007. So mainly the people that have been going down on the Hollywood ladder. I&#8217;m fairly certain that there will be more people that disagree witht his one than with the Rising Starlets 2007 list from last week. The premise is the same in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As promised last week here&#8217;s the list of falling starlets of 2007. So mainly the people that have been going down on the Hollywood ladder. I&#8217;m fairly certain that there will be more people that disagree witht his one than with the Rising Starlets 2007 list from last week. The premise is the same in this case though, these views are only based on one opinion and that&#8217;s mine. I could of course be completely wrong and some of them might have dozens of secret projects lined up. But looking at the current situation the list comes out as this:</p>
<p><span id="more-149"></span><strong><em>10. Jamie Lynn Spears</em></strong><br />
Jamie Lynn was Zoey on Zoey 101 last year, Zoey this year and Zoey next year. Nothing else at all, Zoey 101 is all she does so she&#8217;s pretty much going nowhere in Hollywood. Bad press surrounding her family isn&#8217;t exactly helping her either.</p>
<p><strong><em>9. Hilary Duff</em></strong><br />
Last year I thought Hilary was finally going to do other roles than the sweet and nice girl. She did in War Inc.; the problem with that is that the movie still hasn&#8217;t found a  distributor. Other things she has seen in 2007 is a Razzie nomination for worst actress and a new album which pretty much failed if you compare them to her previous albums.</p>
<p><em><strong>8. Sara Paxton</strong></em><br />
Her only project for 2007 was Sydney White which pretty much flopped. In 2008 the only thing she has lined up is Superhero! Which is destined to fail, so her career really isn&#8217;t going anywhere right now.</p>
<p><strong><em>7. Kirsten Dunst</em></strong><br />
Sure Kirsten has been in one of the most successful movies of the year but that&#8217;s all Kirsten is right now; Mary Jane Watson.</p>
<p><strong><em>6. Kaley Cuoco</em></strong><br />
The Big Bang Theory might be halfway successful her other project for 2007 was Cougar Club a straight to DVD comedy. For 2008 the only thing she has lined up next to the Big Bang Theory is Killer Movie, another movie that&#8217;s destined to fail. Kaley is pretty much doomed to star in mediocre sitcoms.</p>
<p><strong><em>5. Lacey Chabert</em></strong><br />
She never managed to equal the success of her Party of Five days and her role in Mean Girls. In 2007 she only did several small unnoticeable independent movie and at this time it seems to be the same thing for 2008.</p>
<p><strong><em>4. Michelle Trachtenberg</em></strong><br />
In 2007 nothing featuring Michelle was released; she was supposed to star in a new show called the Hill but it was put on hold before they even finished filming the pilot. The show is still on hold for 2008 so it might come out after all. Another thing coming out in 2008 is Dragonlance: Dragons of Autumn Twilight a movie that has been in development for decades but won&#8217;t make it past a video released; so that failed even before it was released. The only thing worthwhile for 2008 will probably be the independent movie The Possibility of Fireflies. She also landed a role in the movie 17 but that won&#8217;t be released until 2009.</p>
<p><strong><em>3. Tina Majorino</em></strong><br />
Tina&#8217;s highlight in her career was of course Napoleon Dynamite. In 2007 her main things were her roles on the TV shows Veronica Mars and Big Love. Both shows have ended now so at this time there are no projects listed for Tina. She seems to be a talented girl to me but it&#8217;s just not working for her right now.</p>
<p><strong><em>2. Emmy Rossum</em></strong><br />
We can be short about Emmy; there were no movie roles for her in 2007 and there are non listed in 2008. She of course released her first album but it failed miserably with a peak ranking of 199 on the Billboard Charts, she&#8217;s pretty much lucky she even made it onto the Billboard Charts.</p>
<p><strong><em>1. Lindsay Lohan</em></strong><br />
Not really a shocker here; both movies she had coming out in 2007 flopped and for 2008 her movie roles aren&#8217;t that certain yet. The going to rehab twice in 2007 doesn&#8217;t help her either, she sure went from making 7.5million dollars a movie to someone who studios don&#8217;t want to touch quickly. She pretty much has to start her career from scratch again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.starletinc.com/2007/12/edition-34-falling-starlets-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

